Fall has arrived and with it comes our annual, and all too familiar, BCS Controversy. This could well have been the year that we finally had the nightmare come true for the BCS Conferences. It seemed highly likely that Boise State and TCU would BOTH finish the season undefeated and that the BCS would be whacked by the WAC.
It also seemed likely that most, if not all, of the 6 BCS conferences
would end up with a 1 loss Champion. That would have been the perfect
storm. Would the BCS pick a one loss BCS Conference Champion over an
undefeated Boise State or TCU? Or, would say a one loss SEC Champion
Auburn be shut out of the BCS Championship game?
But, alas, the BCS got lucky again because at the end of the 2010 college football regular season, we have exactly two undefeated teams from major BCS conferences. If we'd had one or three; there would have been trouble. But, two is the perfect number for the Bowl Championship Series Championship Game to resolve. And, to top things off, Boise State lost to Nevada leaving only TCU with a legitimate (though weak) gripe.
Update: Well, TCU just beat Big Ten Champ Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl and
as a result finished the season undefeated, and has a decent gripe. You
can read more about all this at Auburn vs Oregon BCS Championship Game
The BCS mess is not all bad though. It certainly focuses the collective mind of sports fans everywhere on college football and who should be this year's National Champion (or at least be able to play for it).
And, that is one really good thing about the BCS system that is usually overlooked. It has helped make college football's regular season games the most exciting regular season sporting events in all of sports. The reason is that since only two teams get to advance to the "playoffs" and play for a national championship -- that makes even a single loss in the regular season potentially fatal. So, every game is huge. Thus, fan interest, TV viewership, and revenue are all up during college football's regular season. And that has been good for college football.
Before the BCS, things were fuzzier. The mythical "National Champion" was ... well, mythical. There was no one organization to crown college football's national champion. Instead, there were multiple polls [primarily AP (press) and UPI/ESPN/USA Today (coaches)]. And, each poll would simply vote at the end of the year and name its #1 team.
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) was established to try to "fix" this situation and allow for one "true" National Champion to be crowned each year.
The BCS consists of five bowls that together decide college football's national champion. The bowls are the Rose, Orange, Fiesta and Sugar Bowls. The fifth is the newly created BCS Championship Game.
Before the BCS system, the major conferences all sent their Champions to the major bowl they were (and still are) affiliated with. The point of the BCS system was to break this up a bit to allow the top two teams to face off each year in the BCS Championship Game (regardless of conference they are from) and determine an undisputed National Champion. As we'll see, it's not exactly worked out that way.
The first big problem with the BCS is the inherent injustice in
who gets selected for the BCS National Championship Game. Only one of
the five BCS bowls actually matters for the National Championship,
because there is only one BCS National Championship Game. [This year it
will be held on January 10, 2011 at the University of Phoenix Stadium
(also host of the Fiesta Bowl) in Glendale, Arizona.]
And, that's the crux of the issue. How do you pick only 2 teams to play for the National Championship? History has proven it's simply not possible. There are always more than two teams with a legitimate claim to play in the BCS Championship Game.
At this point in the current (now last year's) 2009 season, BCS controversy and confusion runs rampant as no less than 7 teams have a legitimate claim that they belong in that game. Those teams are:
A couple of those teams will drop out as the season rolls along. Florida and Alabama will likely face each other in the SEC Championship game. So, whichever loses that game will be eliminated. And, Iowa still has to go to Columbus and play Ohio State. If they lose that game, they would be eliminated from the National Championship race.
But, given the relatively weak schedules the rest of the teams have left -- it appears likely that at least 5 teams will end up as undefeated conference champions. Yet, only 2 of them can play for the national title. At least three will get screwed. Again.
This isn't new for the BCS. It happens every year. Well, virtually. Here's a list of the major BCS controversy each year since it started. For the sake of brevity I only highlight the major ones:
The second big BCS problem is unfair distribution of money.
The ten teams that receive bids to the five BCS bowls are the huge winners each year in college football. Not just in terms of rankings and prestige. But also in terms of MONEY -- for them and their conferences.
The 2010 BCS Bowls will pay out $18 million to each team that plays in them (down to $17 million in 2011). By stark contrast, the top non-BCS bowl (Capital One Bowl) will pay out only $4.25 million per team. And, the other bowls pay less, usually much less, than that. For instance, if you are relegated to the Papa John's Bowl, you'll only be taking home $300 K. Hardly covers the cost of the travel costs for the team, cheerleaders and band. So, the first big problem with the BCS is the inequity in who gets selected to a BCS Bowl.
According to the latest BCS Media Guide, during the first 10 years of the BCS, $100 Million was distributed to non-BCS member schools. During this time there were 51 such institutions; so that works out to $196,078 per non-BCS Conference school per year.
Conversely, each BCS conference (SEC, Big Ten, Pac-10, Big 12, ACC, Big East) is guaranteed at least $18 million (because it's guaranteed at least 1 BCS Bowl bid) so that works out to $1.66 Million for each of the 65 BCS Conference schools. [And, in reality it's often more since some BCS Conferences (i.e. SEC and Big Ten) get two BCS Bowl Bids, resulting in an additional 4.5 million (amount conference gets for a second BCS Bowl bid) in any given year.] A big difference.
In 2010, the SEC and Big Ten each got $22.2 million in BCS Payouts. The other four BCS conferences got $17.7 million. The non-BCS conferences averaged $4.8 million from the BCS.
This money issue has led to lots of controversy over alleged SEC Referee Bias.
So, how do we fix all this. Easy, just like every other college or pro sports league. You have a playoff.
Here's our simple, yet effective, College Football Playoff Proposal. The main idea is to expand the number of teams that are able to fight it out on the field, at the end of the season, and determine the National Champion. After all, shouldn't it be decided on the gridiron?
You can read other ideas at College Football Playoff.
Lest you think the BCS has no disadvantages for the major BCS conferences, check this out: BCS Unfair to SEC. And, consider: what if Alabama beats LSU, Auburn, and wins the SEC Championship Game; and finishes with one loss? Should a 1 loss SEC Champ be denied a spot in the National Championship?
And please, let us know what you think, and share your ideas about the BCS controversy, by using the form below or at What Do You Think of the BCS?
Looking for our 2010 - 2011 bowl predictions; bowl schedule; or bowl tickets?
Here's a link to more historical information about the SEC in BCS Bowl Games.
Read More about It's Destiny LSU Vs Alabama Rematch, LSU Vs Alabama Preview and Plus-1 Can Save the BCS.
We'd love to hear your comments and/or opinions. If you submit them here, other visitors can read them, rate them and comment on them. An e-mail address is not required.
Click below to see contributions from other visitors to this page...
Where's the "other" conferences?
In all your sports you list only 6 conferences in your ratings. Where are the other five Division 1 conferences? Or do you have us believe that leagues …
BCS doesn't care
the BCS really doesn't care about who wins what bowls or who goes, they just care about the money, therefore there will never be a playoff system
This years' edition of the Fiesta Bowl was, in my mind, the worst BCS bowl game I have ever watched. Over a decade of watching college football, I have …
who is the bcs?
Who is the BCS really? Where is their office? Who pays their salary? Do they have a phone number, business ID number or is it just some vague organization …
Could We Have a Disputed BCS Championship?
As it stands today, nearly three quarters through the college football season, the race for the BCS title game remains surprisingly open. While Florida, …
You Should Be Ashamed Of Supporting BCS Monopoly Not rated yet
You call yourself a fair and unbiased site? That is the biggest lie I have ever heard in my entire life! This is the most biased article I have ever read. …
Challenges instead of playoff Not rated yet
Instead of having a playoff, allow the teams who still have zero losses or one loss to challenge other teams with zero losses or one loss after their bowl …
BCS Whacked by the WAC Not rated yet
What Boise State’s Rise and Victory over Virginia Tech Means for College Football Anyone who has read my work in the past (I like to flatter myself …
Thanks...but I need a tylenol Not rated yet
All these numbers give me a head ache...Kudo's to whoever did the hard work on putting all the stats together on the entire history of the BCS...conference …
Eliminate Goose Egg Worship Not rated yet
Ok, you're making this more complicated, more difficult than necessary. Here's the deal y'all. Completely eliminate goose egg (right side of W/L record) …