A Look at How National Champions are Named

by Tex/IFRA
(Indiana)

By Tex Noel
Executive Director, Intercollegiate Football Researchers Association

Teams that are listed as champions in the annual NCAA Records Book were named/selected by various men and organizations throughout the years.

A number of the selectors have both their actual champions (as named during the season listed); while others were named years later or before the selector actually began naming a champion—and the term is called "retroactive".

Such is the case with Alabama’s 1925 “National Championship Team.”

Houlgate’s first actual selection—that he made public was in 1926 (through 1958). For unknown reasons, more than likely, through his research, he went back and decided to knowledge select a No. 1 from 1885-1925—these are his retroactive selections.

The Tide’s 1926 title was “earned the same way”, retroactively.

Each selector’s method, whether retroactive or current, is known unto him. Often, teams are selected by the scores they rack-up in a respective season—all without any prior knowledge of how the teams played were that season.

While the Bowl Games are a part of the annual college football season; they haven’t always been as popular (or as many)—which could be why the early AP Polls named a No. 1 based on the regular season.

As proof, all National Champions from the first AP in 1936 through the 1949 season, only two: TCU in 1938 and Texas A&M, a year later, were the only two No. 1’s to “go bowling” but were named National Champion before their annual New Year’s Day Game.

Even as the popularity of the Bowls increased; it was a while for the AP and UP/UPI polls to include them in their respective final polls.
This would take into consideration Alabama’s 1961-64-65 titles.

There has been great debate regarding the 1966 season. Notre Dame and Michigan State battled to a historic 10-10 deadlock and neither one participated in a Bowl Game; while a 11-0 Bama eleven—which included a 34-7 Sugar Bowl win over Nebraska--finished third place in both Wire Service Polls.

Parke Davis was the foremost authority of college football’s formative falls and his annual champs, though at times weren’t in line with top teams of a certain season, were based on his research of the game. His 1933 champions, Michigan and Princeton, were his only actual selections. (He passed away in the summer of 1934.)

The Football Thesaurus as mentioned in the story came along in 1946; but in actuality, it had been around and known 20 years before—as this is the publication of Houlgate.

As the game of college football progressed more and more selectors began naming a No.1 or complete polls—most of the latter have been lost to history.

But of the early selectors, Dickinson and Dunkel are the most widely-accepted; with the latter still in operation.

I think if a selector has earned a reputation of being factual and uses good judgment with his selections, an official title should be credited to a school; not just any person who wants to create his own method or system. While ‘a retroactive’ choice should be used with considerable thought and reason—mainly for historical reasoning and not in the actual count of titles a school has been credited to have won.

So, until then…and with the absence of a playoff format on the Major College level (Bowl Subdivision); this debate has and will continue throughout the ages and as we will all have a say in the annual comment: We’re #1!



Editor's Note: This article was submitted partially in response to this one: Alabama National Championship Myths.

What do you think about a College Football Playoff?

Comments for A Look at How National Champions are Named

Average Rating star

Click here to add your own comments

May 26, 2012
Rating
star
Alabama, their looney fans and The State look as Dumb as 30 for 30 confirms this FACT to the rest of the nation!
by: NOTHINGBUTtheFACTS HERE!

I'm an SEC fan but this almost comical and surely points out and proves what kind of people are from and live down in the hate state of Alabama! What a joke these idiots are, and i can positively tell you that there are THOUSANDS of HARVEY UPDYKE mentalities that live and breed down there! Did you hear that hour long very demented bunch of people on 30 for 30, Thank God it only lasted an hour as they made every Southerner look as bad as ever seen in so many years! We as a Great and proud people that have come so far at educating ourselves and solidifying all the great things that we are so much apart of when it comes to "The New South".....That program set us back a good many years when it comes to being respected and viewed in a very bad light with not only the Harvey Updyke mentality but 99% of the people who spoke on that radio show and some of the former players with that spoke with their proud ebonics "WILL NEVER GAIN US ANY RESPECT FROM THE REST OF THE COUNTRY"....And i cannot say that i really blame them because the Anglo American fans that called the radio station made themselves look and sound like we were still back in the 1950's and 60's and for the African American (some ex-players and some entertainers/Alabama and Auburn fans still refuse to speak educated because they see this as "talking white".... and this is why they INVENTED Ebonics instead of just choosing to speak educated, of coarse if they indeed are? And hear me when i say that not in any way am i saying that the Whites who spoke were or are educated either But The Great Reverand Al Sharpton recently referred to Ebonics as an "Accent" and used a Northerner as his example to justify and defend it! LOL...His example was the late GREAT "John F.Kennedy" as his comparrison for Ebonics being an accent versus a Northern accent, WHAT A HUGE JOKE! ...Well, to all of the South, We CANNOT let these certain people that i have spoken of represent "WHO AND WHAT WE ARE AND CERTAINLY NOT WHO WE CAN BECOME THROUGH TAKING THE BEST EDUCATION SERIOUSLY"..............Lets give our neighbor and fellow Southern State of Alabama some much needed help in regaining some of THE GREAT DEAL of RESPECT lost by this recent self inflicted DAMAGE done and a lot done by their IDIOTIC beliefs of them thinking they won 12 National Championships!!!!...I counted maybe four but since the NCAA says they have six, well then will give them six.....lol.....

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to College Sports Discussion.

By Mo Johnson, Copyright © 2006-2016 SECSportsFan.com

Top of this Page

Online Colleges
Online Colleges

Please Visit our Amazon, Ebay, Etsy and Better Display Cases stores.



Like this Page

Visit Our Social Media Pages

Become a Fan of SecSportsFan on Facebook Follow SecSportsFan on Twitter
Find SecSportsFan on Google+ Follow SecSportsFan on YouTube