SEC vs Big Ten Debate is Settled -- Well, Almost

by Charlie
(Chicago, IL )

It looks like this SEC vs Big Ten football debate has been settled. I stumbled upon this site after reading the comments on EDSBS and trying to find the all-time rivalry record out of curiosity. It seems like everyone concedes the SEC is the best, but the majority of SEC fans refuse to admit that the Big Ten can at least "hang" with the SEC. I know that they do not represent every SEC fan, so it is nice to see this website can give the Big 10 some credit.


Anyway, it looks like the Big Ten has been down for a few years and I don't really know why. I don't find the speed argument valid because the SEC went 1-2 last year in bowls against the Big Ten, I feel like this is overanalyzed based on the BCS title game. We haven't had that traditional Big Ten juggernaut in quite a while. The only one I can think of from recent memory is PSU 94. OSU 02 kind of snuck up on everyone as did 97 Michigan. OSU had the next best shot last year, but they were denied. The Wisconsin Rose Bowl teams of the late 90s were solid, but never truly elite teams.

Your possible explanations for the emergence of the SEC and drop off of the Big Ten included a few things I had never thought of, and it would seem that the warm weather would be one of the strongest indicators in my opinion. Also, the natural football talent in the southeast is much stronger than the Midwest.

Ohio traditionally pumps out some solid players and Pennsylvania as well, but I don't think they come close to Florida (not to mention the state of Louisiana produces more NFL talent than any state per capita). The top 3 states in terms of talent are Florida, Texas and California (perhaps due to size), but they are also warm year round in FL and CA.

I've hit the max for this submission -- Part II next --









Comments for SEC vs Big Ten Debate is Settled -- Well, Almost

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Dec 11, 2007
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Quality, yah ok.
by: Anonymous

Also, the natural football talent in the southeast is much stronger than the Midwest.

Ohio traditionally pumps out some solid players and Pennsylvania as well, but I don't think they come close to Florida (not to mention the state of Louisiana produces more NFL talent than any state per capita). The top 3 states in terms of talent are Florida, Texas and California (perhaps due to size), but they are also warm year round in FL and CA.



Cincinnati Colerain not #1 in OH or even in Cincinnati, beat the defending Texas state champs last year almost by 40 points. We have consistantly 3-5 of the power 25 highschool football teams every year. How can anyone say Ohio doesn't produce football players. Michigan yanks several top recruited players from us every year. They stole a couple of Heismans winners to boot in the past 15 years.

Highschools Players in NFL current

Florida 18,000 177
California 18,000 206
Texas 9,482 175
Ohio 5,339 83

So it's not the quality of players it's the freaking huge amount of schools compared to OHIO. So when you talk about team that can only hold so many players on a active roster then it really doesn't matter about the quantity of players.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to SEC vs Big Ten Debate.

By Mo Johnson, Copyright © 2006-2016 SECSportsFan.com

Top of this Page

Online Colleges
Online Colleges

Please Visit our Amazon, Ebay, Etsy and Better Display Cases stores.



Like this Page

Visit Our Social Media Pages

Become a Fan of SecSportsFan on Facebook Follow SecSportsFan on Twitter
Find SecSportsFan on Google+ Follow SecSportsFan on YouTube